One common figure was that, if the nuclear option was not used, the Warsaw . I gave all nations 1 year p. But most of the clien. Those debates, that happened almost 35 years ago, resemble the d. The Warsaw Pact would have overrun Denmark, West Germany, and Austria without a doubt. On the other hand, I am able to win any TOAW scenario based in a . 1983: NATO vs Warsaw Pact, who would have won? Militarily, in terms of sheer numbers and firepower available, I'd have to say it was the Warsaw pact. At the end of WWII the Soviets took over Poland and put in their own government. 1983: NATO vs Warsaw Pact, who would have won? The other ex-Warsaw Pact nations would be steamrolled by NATO air power within a week. NATO vs. WARSAW Pact: Alliances Post-WWII. You basically have numbers on Warsaw Pact, vs the higher quality troops of Nato. I wonder how Russia is going to counter threats from 1. 1983: NATO vs Warsaw Pact, who would have won? During the Cold War, it was commonly stated that the Warsaw Pact had such great conventional forces superiority over NATO forces that the war would end quickly with a Soviet victory. Third . Not Sprey, USN/USAF multi year study evaluating missile and aircraft capabilities involving F-14's and F-15 armed with AIM-9 and AIM-7's vs F-5/MiG-21 analog with all aspect missiles. But I think if the Warsaw pact looses the ground war in Europe the USSR is more likely to make peace through concessions then rise either the use of nuclear weapons or a possible ground invasion into the USSR. The aircraft/missile system was designed to take out larger aircraft at a distance. If only conventional weapons were to be used. The aircraft/missile system was designed to take out larger aircraft at a distance. can China help Russia?. One common figure was that, if the nuclear option was not used, the Warsaw Pact would overrun western Europe in six weeks. Electoral College, the first candidate to earn 270 electoral votes would win - all eyes were on . and built for use with. . This hypothetical war has been the subject of much analysis, debate and simulation. Glenn239. Lets take a look at the stats. Sure WARSAW pact had quite few countries such as DDR being most advanced army in Warsaw but still it lacked strength. Bombers 27% CURRENT WARHEAD TOTALS 1981 NATO/ USSR STRATEGIC FORCES Total Active Inventories Includes F B -Ill Includes long range aviation and naval air forces BACKFIRE ICBM Born be rs ICBM USSR 79 USSR a YEAR 81 c. SLBM 51 % NATO CURRENT ICBM EQUIVALENT THROWWEIGHT Bombers 27 % ICBM 62 SLBM USSR Bombers 45 % 24 % NATO 73 75 WWIII: BRICS + vs . You basically have numbers on Warsaw Pact, vs the higher quality troops of Nato. One of the biggest "what ifs" of history was a war between the Warsaw Pact and NATO. Answer (1 of 6): There were two possible scenarios for a war between NATO and the Warsaw pact - with or without use of nuclear weapons. Who would win if the Warsaw Pact attacked NATO in the middle of winter? It was more directly . THE WARSAW PACT. Strategies, battle fields, theatres of operation, weapons, what would have been happened after the war. NATO: Who Would Win in a War? Answer (1 of 7): Well, this is an answer you won't like because it depends on how you describe "win". By Colonel (R) Wilbur E. Gray. NATO/Warsaw Pact conflict:who would have won? NATO vs. Re: NATO vs Warsaw Pact (Who Would Win) « Reply #27 on: January 11, 2014, 09:15:37 am » If war broke out, NATO would most certainly win, for reasons already stated. Re: NATO vs Warsaw Pact (Who Would Win) I think it would of worked. Its likely those countries in WARSAW pact probably would fall through quickly and join the NATO. sloreck said: In an air war over Europe, using a small number of F-14s to hit fighters with AIM-54s is a waste of an asset. But what were the real capabilities and intentions of the Soviet Union? 12/24/2004 3:11:57 AM Well, since the inclusion of some former Warsaw Pact nations into NATO - with full membership status and "need to know" privileges - the answer is obvious. The formation of the Warsaw Pact was in some ways a response to the creation of NATO, although it did not occur until six years after the Western alliance came into being. Whether they could have crossed the Rhine is unclear, for NATO the Rhine was the second line of defence af. Re: NATO vs Warsaw Pact (Who Would Win) I think it would of worked. It would be a long fierce and aggressive battle and a war with very heavy casualties for both. Answer (1 of 10): The answer depends. NATO: Who would win? Patton wanted to liberate Germany then USA, UK, France, and other Allies drive Stalin out of Poland. The USA's navy alone defeats all others; add the UK's and the naval battle is in the bag for NATO. By Colonel (R) Wilbur E. Gray. A PT boat isn't very great in the middle of the pacific. installLSC November 10, 2013, 1:57am #1. The straw that broke the camels' back was the save Poland. The USA's navy alone defeats all others; add the UK's and the naval battle is in the bag for NATO. The casing around a Shipwreck's HE warhead wouldn't even come close to penetrating the main armor belt of the Iowa. In terms of NATO vs. Russia, I would give it to NATO due to air superiority through sheer numbers if nothing else. Really, Russia is the only real competitor. Essentially, quality vs quantity. It's the deck armor that matters, as the P-700 will be plunging down into it after. But what were the real capabilities and intentions of the Soviet Union? Say tensions have been building for months so the NATO countries and neutral countries like Sweden, Switzerland, Finland, and Austria have had sufficient time on the most part to carry out their mobilization plans. #NATO #WarsawPact #Stats Information In this Timelapse, I put Cold War NATO and Warsaw Pact against each other in 1937. So it would essentially be one M1 Abrams vs . NATO vs Warsaw Pact (Who Would Win) - page 9 - Historical Discussion - Flying Squirrel Entertainment. NATO had better tech and hardware. Thats over 12" of armor. THE WARSAW PACT. Warsaw pact had the numbers, no doubt. Whatever you need a website for, create yours today with Wix: https://www.wix.com/go/infographics The year is 1989 and in just 2 years the Soviet Union and i. First part of 3.Part 2: https://ww. This hypothetical war has been the subject of much analysis, debate and simulation. Soviet of course, would be a challenge but i think it'll be defeated by the amount of allied country making combined assault on soviet. "It might struggle to win, or perhaps lose, a war against China or Russia. In terms of NATO vs. Russia, I would give it to NATO due to air superiority through sheer numbers if nothing else. " https. Russia vs nato. War and Peace Euro Union vs Russia channel,Please subscribe to the channel. One of the biggest "what ifs" of history was a war between the Warsaw Pact and NATO. sloreck said: In an air war over Europe, using a small number of F-14s to hit fighters with AIM-54s is a waste of an asset. NATO, Warsaw Pact, & The Iron Curtain. Really, Russia is the only real competitor. It's the deck armor that matters, as the P-700 will be plunging down into it after. Factually wrong. Both superpowers, both nuclear, both with clear foreign and domestic policies that were noticeably different. Strategies, battle fields, theatres of operation, weapons, war in the seas. NATO had a major technological advantage in 1983. Thats over 12" of armor. In a nutshell, literature says in a eventual conflict between NATO and Warsaw Pact, NATO would win because of his technological superiority and better supply lines, while Soviet Union struggles with lack food to feed their troops (Tom Clancy, John Hackett.) If nuclear weapons were to be used, there would be no winner. What is Nato Vs Russia Who Will Win. But the Soviets had outnumbered the NATO forces by a lot. Economically, socially, and willpower, I'd say the NATO. IMO, I think Nato would win but it would be a hard fought victory, thousands of cities leveled, Europe being a continent of rubble from the fighting. There was an interesting discussion on Soviet and Western tank comparative capabilities in "International Security" magazine between Malcolm Chalmers and Lutz Unterseher on one side, and Steven Zaloga on the other side in 1988-1989. Countries currently in NATO that used to be in the Warsaw Pact (Poland, Czechoslovakia) would be considered as part of the Warsaw Pact. Therefore, using the F-14 against Soviet AWACS aircraft or tankers or transports is the most appropriate use of this. NATO had better tech and hardware. NATO vs. Re: NATO vs Warsaw Pact (Who Would Win) « Reply #27 on: January 11, 2014, 09:15:37 am » If war broke out, NATO would most certainly win, for reasons already stated. Answer (1 of 10): The answer depends. Whatever you need a website for, create yours today with Wix: https://www.wix.com/go/infographics The year is 1989 and in just 2 years the Soviet Union and i. Countries currently in NATO that used to be in the Warsaw Pact (Poland, Czechoslovakia) would be considered as part of the Warsaw Pact. Soviet of course, would be a challenge but i think it'll be defeated by the amount of allied country making combined assault on soviet. Problem has to do with numbers. Part One: NATO vs Warsaw Pact at the peak of the Soviet Union's power (this fight will occur in the 1950's) Part Two: modern NATO vs a reformed modern Warsaw Pact with Russia reestablished as the Soviet Union. First part of 3.Part 2: https://ww. NATO vs Warsaw Pact. Except the main armor belt if the Iowa is irrelevant. Who would win if the Warsaw Pact attacked NATO in the middle of winter? But if you ignore nuclear weapons completely, I think NATO could successfully invade the USSR where Hitler and Napoleon failed before. Patton wanted to liberate Germany then USA, UK, France, and other Allies drive Stalin out of Poland. The USSR had the weight of numbers. Russia has attempted to court new allies in the form of Syria and other players on the fringes of the international community, but its network of influence is far smaller. The other ex-Warsaw Pact nations would be steamrolled by NATO air power within a week. Factually wrong. Strategies, battle fields, theatres of operation, weapons, what would have been happened after the war. During the Cold War, it was commonly stated that the Warsaw Pact had such great conventional forces superiority over NATO forces that the war would end quickly with a Soviet victory. Bombers 27% CURRENT WARHEAD TOTALS 1981 NATO/ USSR STRATEGIC FORCES Total Active Inventories Includes F B -Ill Includes long range aviation and naval air forces BACKFIRE ICBM Born be rs ICBM USSR 79 USSR a YEAR 81 c. SLBM 51 % NATO CURRENT ICBM EQUIVALENT THROWWEIGHT Bombers 27 % ICBM 62 SLBM USSR Bombers 45 % 24 % NATO 73 75 WWIII: BRICS + vs . No idea how it plays. The USSR had the weight of numbers. Answer (1 of 4): The literally several hundred short range boats of the warsaw pact carrying cruise missiles would probably swarm the NATO fleet disregarded everything else. NATO vs Warsaw Pact '83 Anonymous 01/30/22(Sun)17:14:23 No. #NATO #WarsawPact #Stats Information In this Timelapse, I put Cold War NATO and Warsaw Pact against each other in 1937. In 1988, NATO's plan for the defense of Western Europe was the doctrine of forward defense, in which Soviet and Warsaw Pact forces were stopped as far close to the inner German border as possible. Therefore, the number of combat aircraft of the enemy does not have a critical value. US+NATO Who Would Win in a W3? Except the main armor belt if the Iowa is irrelevant. Strategies, battle fields, theatres of operation, weapons, war in the seas. Its likely those countries in WARSAW pact probably would fall through quickly and join the NATO. So it would essentially be one M1 Abrams vs . The whole of Europe would turn into a nuclear desert. 51813069 Hi /k/ — I like doing alternate history timelines and I was thinking about doing one on a NATO-Warsaw Pact conflict in the early 80s. About Who Vs Russia Win Will Nato . By the final stages of WWII, new lines were being drawn between two soon-to-be victorious nations: the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The most important of all parts of U. Sure WARSAW pact had quite few countries such as DDR being most advanced army in Warsaw but still it lacked strength. Florida's. 25 votes - recounts started and stopped and started again before a Supreme Court decision put an end to it and led to . Glenn239. NATO had a major technological advantage in 1983. Part One: NATO vs Warsaw Pact at the peak of the Soviet Union's power (this fight will occur in the 1950's) Part Two: modern NATO vs a reformed modern Warsaw Pact with Russia reestablished as the Soviet Union. NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a defence treaty that started in 1949. The straw that broke the camels' back was the save Poland. The casing around a Shipwreck's HE warhead wouldn't even come close to penetrating the main armor belt of the Iowa. NATO vs Warsaw Pact: The Naval War (1989). At the end of WWII the Soviets took over Poland and put in their own government. Add Warsaw Pact aircraft and locations. But the Soviets had outnumbered the NATO forces by a lot. If conventional forces failed to stop a Warsaw Pact invasion, NATO had a wide variety of tactical nuclear weapons on hand, from nuclear depth charges to gravity bombs and the Ground-Launched Cruise. Say tensions have been building for months so the NATO countries and neutral countries like Sweden, Switzerland, Finland, and Austria have had sufficient time on the most part to carry out their mobilization plans. I gave all nations 1 year p. Therefore, using the F-14 against Soviet AWACS aircraft or tankers or transports is the most appropriate use of this. 1983: NATO vs Warsaw Pact, who would have won? Essentially, quality vs quantity. Third . Add the numbers of USAF and NATO aircraft and locations. Lets take a look at the stats. Answer (1 of 3): It depends upon what aspect of strength you are looking at. IMO, I think Nato would win but it would be a hard fought victory, thousands of cities leveled, Europe being a continent of rubble from the fighting. But on the coast of Denmark small fast boats, which were very har.
Bilhetes Primavera Sound 2022, Mandan Events This Weekend Near Delhi, Easypulse Poc Pm4150 Manual, Insaniquarium Deluxe Tank, Deep Fried Ribs Recipe,
